Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptions of 20 studies included in a systematic review of anatomical mechanisms of spinal manipulation

From: Mechanisms of manipulation: a systematic review of the literature on immediate anatomical structural or positional changes in response to manually delivered high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation

First author year of publication

Mechanism(s) of spinal manipulation investigated

Study design

Study setting

Study cohort

Sample size:

– N cases

– N controls (or control interventions)

Control group description

Spinal region(s)

Outcome variable(s)

Instrument(s) used for measurement

Time interval between spinal manipulation and measurement

Jirout 1972

Change in vertebral position

Uncontrolled intervention

Humans with palpatory finding of a “blocade” on lateral flexion of neck

250:

− 250

− 0

N/A

Cervical

Vertebral segment position change

Plain radiography

Cramer 2000

Increase in facet joint space

RCT

Chiropractic school, USA

Healthy adults, 22–29 yrs

16:

− 8 (2 groups of 4)

− 8 (2 groups of 4)

(i) Neutral position

(ii) Side posture position

Lumbar

Facet joint space change

MRI

“Immediately”

Cramer 2002

Increase in facet joint space

RCT

Chiropractic school, USA

Healthy adults, 22–30 yrs

64:

− 32 (2 groups of 16)

− 32 (2 groups of 16)

(i) Neutral position

(ii) Side posture position

Lumbar

Facet joint space change

MRI

“Immediately”

Cascioli 2003

(i) Increase in facet joint space

(ii) Formation of intra-articular gas bubbles

Uncontrolled intervention

Medical teaching hospital, South Africa

Chiropractic students, 23–24 yrs, without cervical complaints

2:

− 2

− 0

N/A

Cervical

(i) Facet joint space change

(ii) Intra-articular gas bubble formation

Plain radiography

“Immediately”

Lisi 2006

Change in intervertebral disc pressure

Feasibility

-

Healthy adults, 41–42 yrs

1:

− 1

− 0

N/A

Lumbar

Intervertebral disc pressure

Pressure sensor probe

Immediately and for 15 s after spinal manipulation

Brenner 2007

Change in multifidous muscle thickness

Case report

Army facility, USA

Male, 33 yrs, chronic LBP

1:

− 1

− 0

N/A

Lumbo-pelvic

Thickness of multifidus at rest

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

Haussler 2007

Change in spinal stiffness

Crossover

Equine research park at a university, USA

Healthy adult horses with 2 pins in spinous processes to simulate acute back pain

10:

− 10

− 10

7-day washout before crossover; Control was no intervent

Thoracic

Lumbar

Spinal stiffness

Cable extensometer

Pressure sensor mat

Raney 2007

Change in lateral abdominal muscle thickness

Prospective case series

Army facility, USA

Adults, 18–53 yrs, acute/subacute LBP, SMT responders

9:

− 9

− 0

N/A

Lumbo-pelvic

Thickness of lateral abdominal muscles at rest

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

Wynd 2008

Further damage to already damaged arteries

Uncontrolled intervention

University lab, Canada

Dogs

10:

− 0

− 0

N/A

Cervical

Increase in dimensions of vascular lesion

Intravenous diagnostic ultrasound

Fluoroscopy

-

Palmer 2009

Change in vertebral position

Retrospective case series

Private chiropractic clinic, USA

Chiropractic patients, 18–65 yrs, non-migraine headache

35:

− 35

− 0

N/A

Cervical

Vertebral segment position change (“atlas laterality”)

Plain radiography

“Immediately”

Cramer 2011

Increase in lumbar facet joint space

Feasibility

Chiropractic school, USA

Healthy adults, 25–27 yrs

5:

− 5

− 0

None, but cavitated joints were compared with non-cavitated

Lumbar

Facet joint space change

MRI for gapping; Accelerometer for cavitation

“Immediately”

Fritz 2011

Change in spinal stiffness

Prospective case series

Physiotherapy patients, 19–60 yrs, LBP with or without leg symptoms

51:

− 50

− 0

N/A

Lumbo-pelvic

Spinal stiffness

Mechanical indentation device

“Immediate”

Konitzer 2011

Change in thickness of transverse and internal oblique abdominal muscles

Prospective case series

Army facility, USA

11F, 8M, 21–46 yrs, chronic LBP who met a clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization

19:

− 19

− 0

N/A

Lumbo-pelvic

Thickness of transverse and internal oblique abdominal muscles at rest

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

Puentedura 2011

Change in thickness of transverse abdominal muscles

Crossover, randomised

University, USA

19F, 16M, 21–34 yrs, asymptomatic university staff and students

35:

− 35

− 35

19F, 16M, 21–34 yrs, asymptomatic university staff and students

Lumbar

Thickness of transverse abdominal muscle at rest

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

Cramer 2012

Increase in facet joint space

RCT

Chiropractic school, USA

Healthy adults, 18–30 yrs

40:

− 30

− 10

No SMT; Also cavitated joints were compared with non-cavitated

Lumbar

Facet joint space change

MRI for measuring facet joint space; accelerometer for cavitation

“Immediately”

Barnes 2013

Change in myofascial hysteresis

RCT

Private osteopathic college lab, USA

NR

80:

− 40

− 40

NR

Cervical

Change in tissue texture characteristics

Durometer

“Approx 10 min”

Wong 2015

Change in spinal stiffness

Non-randomised controlled study

18–60 yrs, LBP, SMT responders

107:

− 32 (15 previously identified SMT responders, 17 non-responders)

− 75

(i) 59 asympto-matic (to session 1); 57 for sessions 2 and 3 who did not receive SMT

− 16 w/LBP that did not receive SMT

Lumbo-pelvic

Spinal stiffness

Mechanical indentation device

“Immediate”

Haavik 2016

Change in pelvic floor muscle thickness

Crossover, unrando-mised

Chiropractic school, New Zealand

Healthy pregnant, 18–38 yrs

26:

(i) 11 pregnant

(ii) 15 non-pregnant

(i) 15 non-pregnant

(ii) 11 pregnant

Non-pregnant chiro-practic students, 19–32 yrs

Unspeci-fied spine and/or pelvis

Thickness of levator hiatus muscles at rest

Transperineal diagnostic ultrasound

(i) Same day for pregnant participants

(ii) Not reported for nonpregnant

Flaum 2017

Change in vertebral position

RCT

Medical school, USA

Asymptomatic medical students, 22–40 yrs

51:

− 25

− 26

Asympto-matic medical students, 22–40 yrs

Cervical

Tissue depth to articular pillar compared bilaterally (proxy for vertebral rotation)

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

Fosberg 2019

Change in transverse abdominal muscle thickness

RCT

University and private clinic, USA

18–70 yrs, LBP, SMT responders

67:

− 33

− 34

18–70 yrs, LBP, SMT responders

Lumbar

Thickness of transverse abdominal muscles at rest

Diagnostic ultrasound

“Immediately”

  1. LBP: Low back pain, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, N/A: Not applicable, RCT: Randomised controlled trial, SMT: Spinal manipulative therapy